Teaching Reading

Three Reads & How We Peel Back the Layers

Teaching reading is not as simple as assign reading, read the reading, talk about the reading. It is also not as simple as having students answer some questions or writing an essay about it.

Reading is a process that requires our brains to work overtime in decoding symbols – through detangling single letters, full words, assigned meanings of the words, all to forming ideas (which are largely symbolic until we define and analyze them), and then being able to communicate about them (talk and/or write about it). Did I lose you? Wouldn’t be surprised if I did – writing that was a doozy – because reading and thinking about what we read are a doozy. I’m trying to get underneath the idea that reading is something we just do. It is not. It takes work to do it well.

Let’s pause for a moment and think about how we come to understand what we read. When we read something for the first times, we are working to comprehend what we are reading – to keep up, to follow, to understand on a basic level what is going on. If we were to take a test after that initial reading without processing, we would likely fail it unless all of the questions were comprehension questions.

The truth is that we do not really understand anything with any depth until we can through the second reading. Like watching a movie for a second time, in our second reading of a text, our cognition begins to shift to things that are more satisfying for our minds … we begin to get into the why of the writing. The purpose of it. Our minds love to analyze and our hearts love to feel, so if we enjoyed these in the first reading, we are going to go to a deeper level with both in the second.

Then, there is the third reading. Here I think of seeing a movie for the third time. I don’t know about you, but by a third viewing, I am now beginning to enjoy observing and wondering at how the film was made. That level of analysis brings pleasure on yet a whole new level. The same is true of a third reading. By the third reading, we understand the text well enough to say why we think it was written, and so in the third reading, we begin to be able to connect how the author’s language choices and their impacts directly develop the author’s purpose - the author’s why.

When I assign reading, I come to it with this understanding, which has become a guiding philosophy and approach when I β€œteach” reading, which I don’t really do (they came to me reading – thank you parents and kindergarten teachers), I need the students to do the learning, so they need to do the unpacking. I am there to coach and guide, but they must do the work if they are to grow.

When I began to teach AP Literature and Composition, I felt the pressure to help my students to understand a text deeply and quickly enough to be able to write an essay about it, in 40 minutes (there were three of them). It was through helping my students reach these goals that I found myself voicing to them again and again, β€œYou have to reread it – you are going to miss the deep stuff the first time out.” After tiring of my own repetition, I realized that I needed to create a protocol that would require that they reread, and so I did. I called it Three Reads. Once they learned it, they got good and fast at it – and it paid off. More importantly, I began to teach all of my students the protocol, and guess what? It benefitted all of them, especially the struggling learners.

The complaint about Three Reads is, well, the three readings. If it is simply assigned to the students without the teacher doing it with them (modeling) a couple of times and then having students do it in small groups (building confidence), before releasing them to do it on their own, students are going to lack the confidence to do it, and that feels BAD. They will shut down. They will say, β€œI hate it.”

However, if students are walked through it until they can do it on their own, it actually builds their confidence as they begin to catch things they used to not see. They start to feel β€œsmart,” as some will verbalize proudly. Most did not know they could read let alone analyze a text until they learn like this. And when they complain? Compare it to them seeing their favorite movie, and say, β€œWe are doing the same thing you have done with your movie – we are β€œrewatching” so that we can peel back layers and see what we didn’t see before. Isn’t that fun?”

Beyond the Three Reads Protocol, below you will find other resources that I have developed over the years to guide students through reading assignments.

Three Reads Protocol - Student Instructions

See the thorough explanation written in this page’s introduction to learn more.

Go to Three Reads Protocol Student Instructions >

FREE Resource

For teacher instructions, go to Three Reads Protocol Teacher Instructions >

Three Reads Protocol - Teacher Instructions

For more on the Three Reads Protocol, see the thorough explanation written in this page’s introduction.

In this set of PDF slides, you will find correlations for each of the three reads with the TEKS as well as clear examples of what it looks like in practice.

Go to Three Reads Protocol Teacher Instructions >

For student instructions, go to Three Reads Protocol Student Instructions > FREE Resource
πŸ“˜ FEATURED PUBLICATION

The Finite Writing Book

A definitive blueprint for implementing the TDEC instructional framework in any classroom or learning environment. Packed with actionable lesson plans, real-world work samples, rubrics, and practical strategies built on 25+ years of teaching expertise.

  • β˜… Approaches to teaching writing with the "TDEC" acronym and the Finite Writing Program
  • β˜… Annotated student work samples
  • β˜… Ready-to-use graphic organizers & rubrics
🏫

District Alignment

Adopted by school districts to establish a shared academic language and seamless K–12 continuity in vertical learning.

πŸŽ“

Proven Pedagogy

Authored by veteran educator, instructional coach, and professional learning leader Tara Banton, M.Ed.

πŸ“ˆ

Rapid Student Growth

Delivers noticeable clarity, critical thinking, and noticeable growth in writing within 12 weeks when taught with fidelity.


Testimonials

About TDEC & Finite Writing methods:

Student: β€œHere at Cornell every freshman is required to take a version of a class called the First Year Writing Seminar to develop their writing abilities. The seminars offered through the English department are known for being especially rigorous, so I enrolled in one because I was worried that my writing was not up to the collegiate level. Last weekend I had to write my first essay for my seminar, a two page research-based piece. After doing the initial research, the writing itself actually only took about 50 minutes (a product of all of the timed writings at [high school], I'm sure) and I found that I had subconsciously TDECed the entire paper (despite swearing to myself that TDEC wouldn't follow me to college). I didn't think it was my best work, but I had tests to study for so I submitted it and moved on to other things. When I walked into my lecture on Monday, my paper was projected on the screen. The professor proceeded to have the class analyze it as an "example of an exceptional essay," praising mostly my organization and clarity but also touching on the quote weaving (thanks, TDEC!). I realized after rereading the paper that all of the small things that we learned in AP English (creating a good thesis, quote weaving, organization, and yes, even TDECs) had become a subconscious part of my writing process that really made my writing infinitely better as a whole. I had never realized how much your AP English course taught me until I actually began to think about the roots of the methodologies that I use when I write. Anyway, after class the professor called me aside and told me to thank whoever taught me how to write, so that's exactly what I'm doing. Thank you for preparing me so well for this level of writing (even though I didn't even know you had done it). I know that this foundation in writing will open countless doors for me throughout and after college.”

Parent: β€œI thought that you would be interested to know that he took only one non-film class in his very busy first semester, and that class was College Writing. His teacher was so impressed with his work that, during an end-of-semester interview, she asked him directly where he had learned to write so well.”

Teacher: β€œMs. Banton writes and teaches writing in a structure that combines technicality with creativity. Through the analysis of many excellent writers, she discovered the elements of information that make writing good and the organization that makes it clear. She then teaches others how to teach writing well. It is a trustworthy method of teaching writing because she has data to prove that her students improved significantly as she introduced this system of teaching. My own experience using her methods have been extremely successful. I taught writing for years using various popular methods, but I did not feel successful and did not see measurable growth. Over the last 3 years, I have used the TDEC method, and my students’ improvements are obvious, measurable and sustainable. I feel like a successful writing teacher now.”


Former students talking about Process Revisions: β€œThe process revisions were extremely valuable to me. I found that it was the quickest way for me to focus on what my flaws were and improve them promptly. The methodical nature of the whole process [the full Process Revision exercise] was a very helpful and streamlined procedure. It also forced me to be extra thorough, which enriched my writing after a while. By laying out all the parts of an essay into a clean and organized chart, I was able to physically see where my writing was sparse and lacking. When I compare essays from the beginning of the year to essays at the end of the year, the improvement is truly remarkable.” β€œMy paragraphs were [finally] set with appropriate, descriptive topic sentences and clearly followed the DEC chunk. When I was able to master this, I enabled myself to introduce new, creative ideas in a clear manner. My writing overall has greatly improved, and I know it's because of the repeated revision, which I didn't always enjoy but benefitted from immensely, and thank you, Ms. Banton, for making us do it.” β€œI did not spend the year looking at well-marked essays from previous years of AP English 4 tests; I spent the year looking at rubbish essays of my own, finding out what made them initially rubbish, and identifying how I can circumvent such aspects of my writing under pressure.”